Based on observation
of social media, the latest from climate science deniers appears to
be in two areas: backlash against Climate Activist Greta Thunberg,
and statements to the effect that science has been wrong about the
climate in the past (with the implication that we therefore shouldn’t
believe it now).
The first is easy.
In this Vox.com article, the author, David Roberts, states that in
its typical vile fashion, the right has attempted to use Ms. Thunberg’s mental health against her. But the attempt has
backfired. She is patently authentic, direct in a way that is
unique among public figures, and not at all subject to coercion.
Thus, we have
Greta’s impassioned appeal to the governments of the world through
her speech at the United Nations and others, the enormously
successful Global Climate Strike that she helped lead, and the
miserable failure of attempts to discredit her. Watching it all
unfold, and even taking part in the Strike itself, has been more than
gratifying.
But we are also now
seeing a resurgence of climate-denial talking points to the effect that as
late as the 1970s, scientists thought that the earth was cooling, and
that even when global warming became widely accepted science,
predictions have often been wrong. Let’s break this down a little.
1) Science isn’t
always right, and scientists will be the first to admit that as a
discipline devoted to understanding and pursuit of knowledge,
there have indeed been errors. So yes, before the effect of
greenhouse gasses on atmospheric temperatures became widely
understood, there were theories about a current ‘ice-age cycle.’
The thing about science is, however, that it’s self-correcting. And
we should trust this mechanism. Just because people once thought the
earth was the center of the universe does not mean we should
disbelieve scientists when they now say that it is not.
2) Some of the "previous science" being brought out now never was. It's a pack of lies. Like the doctored Time Magazine cover and the purported scientific predictions about the polar ice cap melting before its time.
2) Some of the "previous science" being brought out now never was. It's a pack of lies. Like the doctored Time Magazine cover and the purported scientific predictions about the polar ice cap melting before its time.
3) Climate science
has only existed in its present form for about 35 years. Yes, the
climate had been studied before that, but it was only in the 1980s
that global temperatures could be measured precisely over time, and
that computer models could become powerful enough to become useful.
They are more useful now than previously, and they will continue to
improve. This is not to say that we should wait to act because the "science isn't complete" yet. Science is never complete. At this point, however, it's certainly complete enough to understand the path forward.
The Right continues
to try to muddy the waters of science and the green movement. We’ve
lamented it before, but this shouldn’t have ever become political
at all. Unfortunately, powerful forces continue to purchase goons on
the Right to use as political hacks and spread nonsense. More
unfortunately, these forces, such as Exxon and Koch Industries, have
resources that are virtually unlimited.
But we, the people,
have Greta. And a couple million other Kids.